August 10, 2012

In the Land of Looney Tunes

Roadrunner Closeup So I've thought about this often, but I don't think I've ever written a post about it, so here it goes: I live in a Looney Tunes cartoon.

OK, not really.

But I have noticed a substantial number of animals (wild or not) in my general area that match up with a large percentage of Looney Tunes characters.  Somehow growing up, I don't think I would have ever really thought of Texas as a locale for most of them, but I guess if Bugs Bunny missed his turn at Albuquerque, then maybe here he is.

So here's a fun rundown of animals that I have seen (live or squashed) within, say, a 3-mile radius of my house, as designated by their Looney Tune character names (and the animal I've actually seen to call it a "win").
  • Bugs Bunny (rabbit)
  • Beaky Buzzard (could be a buzzard, but I'm going with vulture on this one)
  • Cecil Turtle (turtle)
  • Daffy Duck (duck)
  • Elmer Fudd (yeah, I'm sure there are a couple of them around)
  • Foghorn Leghorn (chicken/rooster)
  • Speedy Gonzales (desert type kangaroo mouse)
  • Granny (I've seen her too, I am certain)
  • Henery Hawk (Red Tailed Hawk)
  • Hector the Bulldog (Bulldog)
  • PepĂ© Le Pew (skunk)
  • Slowpoke Rodriguez (other type of mouse)
  • Spike the Bulldog (double counting bulldog because someone in the neighborhood walks a pair of them frequently)
  • Chester the Terrier (Spike's friend, a terrier, on the cartoons.  A small terrier in real life)
  • The Stork (OK, no way have I seen a stork around.  But I have seen several egrets and cranes)
  • Sylvester (black cat)
  • Toro the Bull (Bull with intact horns - there's a longhorn just down the street)
  • Wile E. Coyote (coyote)
  • Road Runner (road runner)
  • Yosemite Sam (Yes, that guy lives here)
I'm sure there are more - I just browsed the list of Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies characters from Wikipedia to make my checklist above - would be interested to see if they have canaries at the pet shop around the corner so I could mark Tweety off the list.

How many cartoon characters hang out around your house?

August 8, 2012

Olympic Fever

London Olympic Rings on the River Thames OK, so I haven't really been watching the Olympics all that much. There's a reason for that.  I've been doing other things.

However, I have (on three occasions) let myself get sucked into a multi-hour Olympics-watching festival, chanting "USA, USA" every time we qualify for a medal round or win some hardware.  I couldn't really find myself that into sculls when it was on during our anniversary outing, but I have been sucked into Misty May-Treanor and Kerri Walsh Jennings' run at women's beach volleyball, and the track and field events sprinkled in between.

What I have found myself annoyed by, primarily, is the commentary and production of the Olympics for U.S. television.  Thanks, NBC.

While I can overlook the delays to prime time to attract more viewers (I mean, I wouldn't be watching in the middle of the day, so I get it), the delay should add flexibility to the production schedule, but apparently it doesn't.

Let's contrast some things:


  • Good Production: Consolidating a men's high jump heat into back-to-back jumps, showing the entire heat in under a minute.
  • Bad Production: Cutting to commercial in the middle of a volleyball game only to return with the score changed by 5 or more points.
  • Good Production: Showing entire races during track and field events
  • Bad Production: Showing dead-time in between events when there are other events with action being cut out.
  • Bad Production: Pretty much half of what Bob Costas says.
  • Bad Production: Comments made during the intro parade that some countries (like the one currently on your screen) are just fodder for the others to beat.
  • Bad Production: incessant talking over the entire opening ceremonies (because we are too dumb to figure it out).
  • Bad Production: cutting to commercial during the (delayed) opening ceremonies and returning with chunks missing (Sex Pistols anyone?)
Anyway, the opening ceremonies were the worst of it, and someone probably should never be involved in a live event (on delay) again for the way that was handled (go produce reality TV on a B-tier cable network), but the problems have persisted even into the coverage.  It's too bad, really.

The delay I can live with (though the first couple of times I "spoilered" myself by using Wikipedia to look up an athlete only to see what medal they won in the event I was currently watching made me smack my forehead).  I should know Wikipedia and our other internet friends will be far faster than delay reel to US television.  My bad.

The inane talking head business, though?  That I could do without.  And the "good stuff" on the cutting room floor?  That's inexcusable.

Still a few days left, NBC.  Fix it.

Oh, and I'm probably not watching anymore anyway.  Unless I get sucked in again.

August 4, 2012

Predicting the Future from the Past

Crystal ball (1)OK, so there is no real science to this, or there is, depending how you look at it.  Basically, here's what I've done:  Using my calculations, etc. from my fancy college football numbers algorithms (should I have been a baseball fan if I am interested this much in the stats? I guess if baseball wasn't so boring), I ran through the week 1 schedule of the 2012 football season and predicted the outcomes of the games using the 2011 season as seed data (this makes this completely unreliable, FYI, but this is provided for entertainment purposes only).

So, here's how you read this lovely chart below.  First I have them ranked by my "confidence factor" and I have the Away team and score versus the Home team and score.  In some of these games, it's a neutral site game and I just used whichever one was listed last in my input schedule file as the home team.  Then I've given a "confidence" on how much the model thinks you should trust the result (win/loss) - for my internal notes, that means Extremely High - factor of 2+, High - factor of 1-2, Good - factor of 0.75-1, Medium - factor of 0.6-0.75, and Low (coin flip) 0.5-0.6.  I've also formatted so that the winner is bold, to make it easier to read.

The scores really should just show spread capabilities and are not meant to represent ACTUAL predictions of scores.  Though it would be interesting to see how that plays out (I've run against some actuals from 2011 and it was OK in some instances, not in others.  Will be interesting to see how confidence metric versus score actuals plays out.  Perhaps after Week 1, I'll revisit these predictions to see if it is anywhere close.
edit: Realized this was backwards with Home & Away - and then couldn't really swap the columns, so for now you get it backwards (but now labelled correctly). Will work to fix in future predictions.

Prediction Rank Home Team Home Score Away Team Away Score Confidence
1 Utah 30 Northern Colo. 21 Extremely High
2 Oklahoma St. 39 Savannah St. 17 Extremely High
3 Indiana 23 Indiana St. 36 Extremely High
4 Akron 10 UCF 37 Extremely High
5 Tulane 20 Rutgers 31 Extremely High
6 New Mexico 15 Southern U. 34 Extremely High
7 Fla. Atlantic 18 Wagner 31 Extremely High
8 Kansas St. 38 Missouri St. 24 Extremely High
9 Mississippi 21 Central Ark. 33 Extremely High
10 Temple 30 Villanova 15 High
11 Middle Tenn. 22 McNeese St. 30 High
12 Idaho 24 Eastern Wash. 33 High
13 Air Force 36 Idaho St. 27 High
14 Oregon St. 28 Nicholls St. 26 High
15 Kansas 24 South Dakota St. 38 High
16 Maryland 23 William & Mary 31 High
17 Memphis 22 Tenn.-Martin 37 High
18 Duke 21 FIU 31 High
19 BYU 28 Washington St. 27 High
20 LSU 29 North Texas 21 High
21 Arizona 35 Toledo 45 High
22 Stanford 34 San Jose St. 23 High
23 La.-Lafayette 39 Lamar 26 Good
24 Houston 38 Texas St. 26 Good
25 UTEP 23 Oklahoma 35 Good
26 Vanderbilt 15 South Carolina 26 Good
27 Southern California 30 Hawaii 29 Good
28 Kent St. 19 Towson 34 Good
29 Mississippi St. 22 Jackson St. 33 Good
30 UNLV 19 Minnesota 33 Good
31 Boston College 17 Miami (FL) 25 Good
32 Fresno St. 33 Weber St. 34 Medium
33 Navy 23 Notre Dame 30 Medium
34 Wake Forest 24 Liberty 35 Medium
35 Iowa St. 26 Tulsa 34 Medium
36 Florida 23 Bowling Green 23 Medium
37 Louisville 24 Kentucky 21 Medium
38 Rice 22 UCLA 36 Medium
39 Virginia Tech 26 Georgia Tech 25 Medium
40 Nebraska 21 Southern Miss. 31 Medium
41 North Carolina 29 Elon 23 Low (Coin Flip)
42 Pittsburgh 22 Youngstown St. 36 Low (Coin Flip)
43 Michigan St. 20 Boise St. 30 Low (Coin Flip)
44 Auburn 20 Clemson 38 Low (Coin Flip)
45 Washington 27 San Diego St. 36 Low (Coin Flip)
46 Oregon 31 Arkansas St. 30 Low (Coin Flip)
47 Syracuse 23 Northwestern 29 Low (Coin Flip)
48 Alabama 26 Michigan 24 Low (Coin Flip)
49 Connecticut 25 Massachusetts 28 Low (Coin Flip)
50 Central Mich. 25 Southeast Mo. St. 29 Low (Coin Flip)
51 South Fla. 20 Chattanooga 27 Low (Coin Flip)
52 Florida St. 32 Murray St. 30 Low (Coin Flip)
53 Purdue 21 Eastern Ky. 30 Low (Coin Flip)
54 Colorado 25 Colorado St. 30 Low (Coin Flip)
55 Penn St. 17 Ohio 24 Low (Coin Flip)
56 Utah St. 24 Southern Utah 33 Low (Coin Flip)
57 UAB 25 Troy 32 Low (Coin Flip)
58 California 22 Nevada 38 Low (Coin Flip)
59 Texas 26 Wyoming 27 Low (Coin Flip)
60 Ball St. 22 Eastern Mich. 34 Low (Coin Flip)
61 Illinois 19 Western Mich. 34 Low (Coin Flip)

August 1, 2012

Open Letter to Drivers (myself included)

Excerpt from actual police crash report - I am shown as "Unit 2"
So last week I got in a small vehicular accident - Let's start with I am fine, I was decelerating (is that a word?) when it occurred, no real trauma to me or anything, nobody was injured other than vehicle property damage, etc. though it might be a little bit before my car is back to tip-top.

But it made me think about driving a little bit and how horrible most people (myself included) are at driving.  So since then (while cruising in my sweet rental car), I've been observing stupid things that drivers do (every single day) and so I'm asking, for your sake and mine (and our insurance premiums), don't do these things:


  • Think you are a good driver -Let's be honest, you aren't.  Or at least the percentages are against you based on the number of people I see doing all these dumb things.
  • Use your cell phone for things other than talking - texting, getting maps, or dialing numbers manually to make a call all take your eyes off the road.  And most of you (and occasionally me), think that you are watching the road the whole five miles I drove next to you watching you stare at your phone.
  • Follow too closely - This causes all sorts of excessive braking, and at least one rear-impact collision that I pass on my way to work per week
  • Drive too fast - OK, I'm not going to say you have to go "grandma-style" under the speed limit, but on the tollways, I occasionally see people (and I'm especially talking to you, guy-doing-handstands-on-your-crotch-rocket-motorcycle) driving close to 100 and doing really dumb weaving in and out of traffic.
  • Drive too slowly - particularly in the left lane.
  • Ignore where you are going - Changing lanes?  Might want to check the mirrors and blind spot and use your blinker.  Backing up?  How about you look over your shoulder like they taught you in driver's ed?
  • Try to avoid traffic - TONS of traffic problems that I see are from jerks that are trying to zip up and around all the slow traffic and then merge in at the last possible second - causing, guess what, slow traffic.
  • Think you are more important than other drivers - Let's face it.  This is the crux of it all.  Most of the impatience and crazy driving I see is because you, the bad driver, think that you are more important than the other people on the road, and therefore are entitled to get there faster, with less hassle.  You think that you don't deserve the traffic around you and that you are so important that you must get to your (insert here: job, proctology exam, IRS audit, Kenny Chesney concert) quicker than the rest of us, so you do stupid things to get there faster, and you get irritated when your stupid things (or the stupid things that others do) slow you down.  Say it with me: you are not that important.  And where you are going is most likely not going to be enjoyable anyway.  And if you are that late, perhaps it is your fault, procrastinator.  Leave earlier next time.  Priorities.
Anyway, bad drivers of the world, this is just a starting point.  I am sure there are a hundred other stupid things you (and I) do that are stupid, dangerous, and contribute to the overall bad driving and heavy traffic on the planet.  Just stop it.  Give a little room for the car in front of you.  Leave yourself enough room to stop so the bad driver behind you doesn't slam into you when you have to stop suddenly.  Watch the road, not your ongoing game of Angry Birds or Words with Friends where you finally got to play "quinoa" on a triple letter score against your cousin.

Just be better.  And I hope, as a result, you never get listed in an actual police crash report as "Unit 1" or "Unit 2" or "Unit whatever."  Even if it's the OTHER bad driver's fault.

Cheers!